As I sit and ponder the universe so deep, I wonder if the things I sow are what I'll really reap. Is the helping of other people the purpose of my life? Is this the way to happiness and the avoidance of strife? But if what I give to others is returned a hundred fold, is not selfishness my motive and not whom I behold? So what's the moral answer to helping those in need? Should I give to them aplenty or just a starting seed? Should I give until it hurts or give 'til it feels good? Must I give until I'm needy and beg another's goods? Perhaps it is the value of another in my sight that determines the 'mount of giving that is moral and is right. For what if the stranger I rescue a murderer would be? Would I be in part responsible for the survivors that will grieve? But then again the one I save might be the man who would make the world a better place and promulgate the good. So how do I strike a balance between others' needs and mine? Should I possess a vineyard while you possess a vine? I must admit that though I help others who have need, I still own a nice big house, two cars, and two TVs. Although I put some men's misery above things I could possess, I put stereos and computers above others who are left. Is the lap of luxury upon the knees of Satan or just a place that those with need love to direct their hate at? With all the things that I've just said, how do I decide what to keep and what to give? How's this moral law applied? If giving all is good and nothing sin, then where's the dividing line? Exactly how much should I give to be a moral man? Or perhaps the poor among us should get the powers that be to forcibly take from those with much and give to those in need. But consider that coercion does not moral giving make 'cause charity in its truest form is freewill give and take. So how should we divide our goods whether all or just residuals? The only moral and proper way is to leave it to individuals.